How Wall Street Is Forcing Your 401(k) to Fund the Coming AI Bust for Total Data Control

Image by Open AI

Written by blog contributor, Chatman Gepeter

History shows that infrastructure booms rarely end when the financial bubble bursts. The investors may lose everything, but the physical network they financed survives and often ends up under the control of institutions wealthy enough to purchase it after the collapse.

During Britain’s Railway Mania of the 1840s, promoters raised enormous sums from ordinary investors by promising that an expanding rail network would produce extraordinary returns. Speculative railway shares soared, competing companies constructed overlapping routes, and families poured their savings into the boom. When the bubble broke, share prices collapsed and countless investors were ruined. The tracks, stations, land rights, and transportation corridors did not disappear. Larger operators eventually absorbed failed competitors and consolidated the network that public speculation had helped finance.

The dot-com boom followed the same pattern. Investors flooded internet and telecommunications companies with money, much of it flowing through mutual funds and retirement accounts. Those companies spent heavily on fiber optic cable, server facilities, and communications networks while promising profits that many could never deliver. When the bubble burst, shareholders watched trillions of dollars in market value vanish. Yet the physical internet infrastructure remained. Bankrupt companies were dismantled, their assets were purchased cheaply, and the surviving network became the foundation upon which a smaller group of dominant technology corporations built the modern digital economy.

The coming AI bust does not mean artificial intelligence will disappear. It means the financial promises surrounding AI may collapse long before the infrastructure does.

Today’s technology giants are spending extraordinary amounts on chips, data centers, power generation, cooling systems, fiber networks, and land. Much of the public is already financing this expansion indirectly because the companies leading it dominate the market indexes held inside millions of 401(k)s, pensions, and Target-Date Funds. Workers do not need to deliberately purchase a speculative AI stock. Every automatic retirement contribution can increase their exposure to the corporations funding the buildout.

If AI revenue fails to justify these enormous expenditures, share prices could collapse while the physical system remains firmly in place. Retirement accounts would absorb part of the market loss, but the data centers, energy contracts, water rights, fiber routes, proprietary models, and surveillance capacity would still exist. Cash-rich corporations, banks, creditors, and private-equity firms could then acquire distressed assets at sharply reduced prices, consolidating control over infrastructure that public savings helped finance.

That is what separates the AI boom from earlier infrastructure manias. Railroads centralized transportation. The internet centralized communication and commerce. AI infrastructure can centralize the collection, interpretation, and control of human data itself.

This is the “Involuntary Shareholder” loop: workers are automatically exposed to the financial risk through their retirement accounts, private insiders gain an avenue to convert inflated valuations into real wealth, and the institutions positioned to survive a crash can emerge owning the underlying digital infrastructure. The public finances the boom, absorbs the bust, and is left living inside the system that remains

Introducing The Body Buddies: A 5-Book Children's Series by Julie Telgenhoff

 

Images Created by Open AI

Most of us grow up learning the basics of the human body. We learn that the heart pumps blood, the lungs help us breathe and the stomach digests our food. But how many of us were ever really taught about the lymphatic system? What about fascia, the connective tissue woven throughout the body? 

These systems play important roles in how our bodies function, yet many people reach adulthood knowing almost nothing about them. 

That realization became the inspiration for The Body Buddies book series. I wanted to find a way to introduce these ideas to young children before words like lymphatic system, fascia and cellular waste ever had a chance to sound complicated. 

The solution was to turn the body into something almost every child understands: a house. 

Inside the Body House, the cells become the rooms. Celly and Shelly live there and, just like us, they need food and water to do their jobs. They also make "cellular" waste that has to be cleaned up. 

Bud (the blood) represents the kitchen, and his job is to bring oxygen, water and nutrients to the cells. 

Lynn, Patrick and the Lymphettes represent the lymphatic cleanup system from the bathroom, collecting extra fluid and waste and helping keep the Body House clean. 

Then there is Ms. Fascinista, who represents fascia. Her stretchy connective web runs throughout the Body House, surrounding, supporting and connecting everything together. She helps children see that the different rooms and Body Buddies are not isolated from one another. 

They are all part of one connected body. 

That is really the message behind the entire series. The human body is not simply a collection of separate parts. Everything works together. And by using a house, lovable characters and a little bathroom humor, The Body Buddies gives young children a simple way to begin understanding the incredible body they live in. 

My hope is that The Body Buddies series sparks curiosity and helps kids grow up feeling connected to and amazed by the incredible bodies they live in. 

You can download the first book in the five-part Body Buddies series, My Cells Poop & Pee ...Just Like ME!, for FREE here: https://payhip.com/b/YNtAm

If you enjoy the first book, each additional book in the five-part Body Buddies series is available for just $2.99 here: https://payhip.com/TheBodyBuddies

.

“Turn Iran Into a Parking Lot”: The Bloodlust Beneath America’s Latest War

Image: Screenshot from LiveNOW from FOX

Written by Julie Telgenhoff

Fox News posted a video under the headline:

“U.S. Strikes Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Over an Attack That Killed Troops in Jordan.”

That headline tells the audience exactly how to process the story. Iran attacked Americans and Americans died. The United States struck back, and justice was served.

The current official account says Iranian missiles and drones attacked a military base in Jordan on July 17, killing two American service members, leaving another missing and injuring others. The United States then launched additional strikes against Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, claiming the targeted forces were responsible for the attack.

That is what we are being told.

Perhaps every detail is true. Perhaps some of it is true. Perhaps crucial context has been removed. The problem is that the American public has no independent way to verify what happened, who authorized what, what intelligence supposedly established responsibility or what occurred before the moment selected for the headline.

We receive military statements, government-approved footage, satellite images, anonymous intelligence claims, carefully edited news segments and emotionally loaded headlines. Then we are expected to form an instant moral judgment which is to support killing people in another country before the first commercial break.

Artificial intelligence has made this information crisis infinitely worse. Video can be fabricated. Voices can be cloned. Photographs can be generated. Real footage can be stripped of context, relabeled and circulated as evidence of something entirely different. Authentic material can also be dismissed as artificial intelligence whenever it becomes inconvenient.

Yet at the exact moment when trusting visual and official evidence has become more dangerous than ever, millions of people appear more certain than ever.

They do not ask what came before the attack. They do not ask why American troops are stationed in Jordan. They do not ask who benefits from expanding the war, what negotiations collapsed or how many Iranian civilians have already been killed. They do not ask whether American attacks on Iranian infrastructure helped produce the retaliation now being presented as the beginning of the story.

They simply demand more blood. These were among the comments posted beneath the Fox News video:

“Turn Iran into the world’s largest parking lot.”

“Unconditional surrender. Nothing less.”

“Don’t stop until 100% submission.”

“It’s about time to extinct the IRGC now.”

“Iran only understands the language of violence. May the USA military speak to them loudly.”

“The only time we stop is when there is no one to make a deal with.”

“Lock and load.”

“They should finish the job.”

These comments are disgusting.

They are the words of people treating war like a football game. They are cheering for bombs to fall on cities they could not locate on a map, filled with human beings whose names, families and lives mean nothing to them.

“Turn Iran into a parking lot” does not describe a surgical strike against a military target. It imagines the obliteration of a country containing tens of millions of people. It means homes, hospitals, schools, animals, children and generations of history reduced to rubble.

There is nothing patriotic about craving that destruction.

What makes the spectacle even more grotesque is how often this bloodlust is wrapped in Christianity. “God bless our military,” someone writes, surrounded by demands for extinction, submission and annihilation.

Which God are they blessing?

Certainly not the Jesus who told people to love their enemies, bless those who curse them and show mercy. Their version of God has been merged with the Pentagon, draped in an American flag and placed aboard a bomber. Christianity becomes another weapon of empire: our soldiers are blessed, our dead are sacred and everyone killed by our weapons becomes an anonymous consequence of war.

Americans have been shown what this language hides before.

On July 12, 2007, a U.S. Apache helicopter crew opened fire on people in Baghdad. Among those killed were Reuters journalists Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh. The helicopter footage was later released by WikiLeaks under the title “Collateral Murder.” It showed the attack from the military’s own camera and allowed the public to hear the crew’s words as human beings were targeted below.

That was the reality missing from the sterile phrase “collateral damage.”

The dead were not pixels. They were not enemy markers on a screen. They were people. A van that arrived to help the wounded was also fired upon. Children inside the vehicle were injured.

That footage revealed the obscene distance between how warfare is sold and how it is experienced.

The public is shown a clean launch from an aircraft carrier. It is not shown the human body after the missile arrives.

It is shown a glowing target on a military screen. It is not shown the mother searching through concrete for her child.

It is told that infrastructure was “degraded.” It is not shown families without electricity or clean water.

It hears that a target was “neutralized.” It never learns the person’s name.

Reports about the current campaign say American strikes have already hit bridges, electrical facilities and water-desalination infrastructure in Iran. Iran has retaliated across the region, including in Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain. The fighting has expanded, diplomacy has deteriorated and civilians throughout the region are being placed in danger.

This is how wars grow. Every attack becomes the justification for the next one. Each country presents its strike as defensive and the other side’s strike as unprovoked savagery. The audience is given a fresh starting point every morning so yesterday’s aggression can be forgotten.

Fox’s headline begins with the American retaliation. It does not contain the entire chain of events that led to it. A headline rarely does.

That is precisely why an informed population should hesitate before demanding the destruction of another nation.

Americans were deceived about Vietnam. They were shown incubator stories before the Gulf War. They were sold weapons of mass destruction before Iraq. They were promised short wars, precise strikes, liberation and democracy. The bodies accumulated long after the television cameras moved on.

Now the same public has entered an age when governments, militaries, intelligence agencies, corporations, algorithms and artificial intelligence can all participate in manufacturing perception.

And the response from the sheep beneath the Fox video is not caution.

It is “Turn Iran into a parking lot.”

They do not know what is true. They do not know what has been omitted. They do not know whether the images they are seeing are authentic, selectively edited, mislabeled or generated. They do not know who has already been killed on the other side.

But they are certain of what they do want. They want more blood and war.

That may be the most frightening weapon of all: a population trained to confuse vengeance with patriotism, propaganda with knowledge and mass killing with the will of God.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If my work has helped you in any way, you can support my independent writing here:  https://buymeacoffee.com/asheepnomore

Every bit helps me keep researching, writing, and sharing outside the corporate-approved narrative. Thank you. 

Your Retirement Is Quietly Becoming AI's Biggest Investor

Article by Julie Telgenhoff

Most Americans believe their retirement account is exactly that, a retirement account. They contribute money from every paycheck, select a target date fund or broad market index, and rarely look at it again. They trust that firms like Vanguard, BlackRock, and Fidelity will manage their investments responsibly.

But a profound shift is taking place.

The artificial intelligence revolution will require trillions of dollars to build. Data centers, semiconductor manufacturing, electrical grid expansion, transmission lines, water infrastructure, and computing power all demand unprecedented amounts of capital. The question is not whether AI is expensive. The question is: who will pay for it?

Enter BlackRock CEO, Larry Fink. He recently answered that question in his own words.

He explained that if America intends to remain the global leader in artificial intelligence, the investment is not optional. He said the required capital would come from the private sector, specifically from "savings accounts, from pension accounts, from insurance companies, on and on and on."

That statement deserves far more public attention than it has received.

For decades, Americans have been told to "set it and forget it." Enroll in your company's retirement plan, choose an index fund, and let compound interest do the rest. But what most investors never see is what happens after they stop paying attention.

As major AI companies enter the public markets and are added to broad market indexes, millions of retirement accounts will own those companies automatically through index funds. Most investors will never vote on that decision. They will never receive a phone call asking whether they want their retirement savings invested in artificial intelligence companies. The allocation simply changes as the index changes and that is the nature of passive investing.

The timing of all of this is what makes Larry Fink's comments so significant.

While he was explaining where the trillions of dollars needed for America's AI buildout would come from, an unprecedented wave of artificial intelligence companies was simultaneously preparing to enter the public markets. Some are building the large language models themselves. Others are building the data infrastructure, cloud computing platforms, and enterprise software that will power the AI economy for decades to come.

As these companies become publicly traded and are eventually added to the major indexes, millions of retirement accounts could gain exposure to them automatically through the index funds Americans already own.

Here are some of the largest AI-related companies expected to enter the public markets over the next two years:

On the surface, there is nothing unusual about any of this. Companies go public. Index funds buy them. Retirement accounts own them. That is precisely how passive investing has worked for decades.

But when viewed alongside Larry Fink's remarks, another possibility emerges. Fink didn't simply say AI would require trillions of dollars. He specifically identified where much of that capital would originate: savings accounts, pension accounts, and insurance companies.

BlackRock isn't speaking from the sidelines. The company reported $192 billion in net client inflows during the second quarter of 2026, nearly tripling the $68 billion it attracted during the same period a year earlier. As more money flows into firms managing retirement assets, so does their ability to allocate capital across the economy, including into sectors they believe will define the future, such as artificial intelligence.

Is it possible that most Americans will unknowingly become financiers of the AI revolution because their retirement assets are managed by firms that automatically purchase these companies as they enter the major indexes?

That is a question every retirement investor should consider for themselves.

And the concern does not stop with money. Anyone following the AI trail has already seen the warnings about where this technology could lead when it is combined with digital identity, biometric tracking, centralized banking, surveillance systems, automated decision-making, and control over access to basic services. What is being sold as convenience and efficiency could eventually become the infrastructure for a digital prison that was built gradually and financed by the very people who may one day find themselves trapped inside it.

If you have a 401(k), IRA, pension, or brokerage account, now is the time to stop assuming someone else is watching your money. Find out exactly which funds you own. Are they broad market index funds? Nasdaq funds? Target Date funds? Do they already hold AI companies? Will they purchase additional AI companies as they go public? 

Perhaps Americans need to step back into their own power and abandon the old advice to “set it and forget it.” This may be the moment to do the opposite. Because without even realizing it, you could eventually be helping finance the very digital prison that may one day close around you.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If my work has helped you in any way, you can support my independent writing here:  https://buymeacoffee.com/asheepnomore

Every bit helps me keep researching, writing, and sharing outside the corporate-approved narrative. Thank you.