Have You Heard of Toka? The Company Behind Digital Deception

 

Image: OpenAI

by Julie Telgenhoff

“If you’re not doing anything wrong, what does it matter?”

It is the familiar response whenever concerns about surveillance arise. Cameras are everywhere, people say, but innocent people have nothing to worry about.

That argument collapses when the camera footage itself can be changed.

Imagine being accused of entering a building you never visited. Imagine surveillance footage showing your vehicle somewhere it never went. Or imagine a crime being captured on camera, only for the people responsible to disappear from the recording.

When video can be manipulated, innocence no longer protects you.

Many Americans have heard something about Flock Safety, the company installing license-plate readers and surveillance cameras throughout communities nationwide. Its systems track vehicles, record movements, and provide police with growing amounts of information.

But far fewer people know about Toka.

Toka is an Israeli-founded cyber-intelligence company now headquartered in Maryland. Its clients include governments, military organizations, intelligence agencies, and law enforcement. Its website openly advertises “frictionless surveillance,” covert access, targeting and tracking, and data extraction.

Unlike companies that install cameras, Toka reportedly specializes in penetrating cameras that already exist.

An investigation by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, based on internal company documents reviewed by a technical expert, reported that Toka’s technology can locate nearby security cameras and webcams, access their feeds, and alter both live footage and previously recorded video. The investigation also described the ability to erase evidence of covert operations.

Think about what that means.

A camera outside a business could capture someone entering a building. Another could record a vehicle leaving. A doorbell camera might establish the timing. Ordinarily, those separate recordings help investigators determine what happened.

But if those systems can be remotely accessed and manipulated, the footage people trust to establish the truth could become the mechanism used to conceal it.

The issue is no longer simply who is watching.

It is who can rewrite what the camera saw.

Toka was co-founded by former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak and former Israeli military cyber chief Yaron Rosen. The company says it serves customers across 13 countries and has positioned itself closer to American government agencies through its Maryland headquarters.

And there is a very important connection not being discussed and that needs to be exposed. What is it? Well, Flock and Toka share the same major investor: Andreessen Horowitz (also known as a16z).

This venture capital and private equity firm led Flock’s $275 million funding round while also backing Toka. That means the same financial interests are funding both the expansion of surveillance cameras across American communities and a company whose technology can reportedly penetrate and manipulate camera systems. Let that sink in...

One company helps build the network.

The other reportedly offers the tools to enter it.

That is the danger. Surveillance does not merely document reality when someone has the power to rewrite it.

And this technology is not being discussed solely in the context of foreign intelligence operations. TechCrunch reported that Andreessen Horowitz cofounder Ben Horowitz attempted to fund the purchase of Toka software for the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Toka said the department ultimately declined.

The fact that such an arrangement was considered shows how close these capabilities already are to ordinary American policing.

People are arguing about the cameras they can see.

The greater question concerns the invisible access layered on top of them.

Who controls it? Who authorizes it? Who audits it? And if footage can be altered without leaving an obvious trail, how would anyone know when the official record no longer reflects reality?

Flock expands the surveillance network. Toka reportedly offers the ability to turn existing networks into covert intelligence assets and potentially change the record afterward.

Imagine a whistleblower leaving a government building with documents exposing corruption. Security cameras record who followed them, when they entered the parking garage, and which vehicle drove away. If someone can remotely access those cameras and alter the footage, the whistleblower could appear to have left alone while the people following them vanish from the record.

Or consider the reverse: footage could potentially be manipulated to place someone at a location they never visited. Suddenly, a camera recording becomes evidence against an innocent person, and the people controlling that evidence also control the story it tells.

Suddenly, “If you’re not doing anything wrong, what does it matter?” doesn't sound very reassuring anymore.

The Illusion of Solidarity: How 2020 Divided Society and Conditioned Us for What Comes Next

Image: OpenAI

The post 2020 social landscape is often viewed as a series of random misfortunes, but a closer look reveals a calculated proof of concept for mass narrative control. True authority does not require direct coercion; it relies on perception management, which is the systematic shaping of collective belief to dictate human behavior. By exploiting cognitive fatigue, weaponizing everyday language, and driving strategic polarization, powerful institutions successfully transformed an era of mandatory isolation into a forced demonstration of compliance. The resulting cultural fracturing was not an accidental byproduct of a public health crisis, but the deliberate architecture of subversion, designed to erode organic human bonds and condition the public for the next phase of centralized control.

Perception management operates on a simple principle: reality is not merely what happens, but what people believe is happening. Shape that belief, and behavior follows.

Those who understand this principle do not need to control every individual directly. They need only influence the narratives through which people interpret events, identify threats and decide whom to trust.

Behind much of what appears chaotic or spontaneous is a controlling faction of powerful institutions, corporate interests, political operators and media networks capable of coordinating public perception toward predetermined outcomes. Major events are not always introduced to the public as isolated circumstances requiring an immediate response. They can also become opportunities to reshape behavior, consolidate authority and normalize changes that might otherwise face widespread resistance.

How it works:

• The event captures attention. 
• The narrative defines its meaning. 
• Repetition establishes the approved interpretation. 
• Fear discourages scrutiny. 
• Social pressure enforces compliance. 

And by the time the immediate crisis fades, the desired changes have already been absorbed into everyday life.

There are several perception management techniques that make this possible.

Information overwhelm produces decision fatigue. A constant stream of alarming headlines, contradictory claims and changing instructions exhausts the public’s ability to think critically. When people become mentally overwhelmed, they are more likely to accept simple explanations and authoritative guidance.

Narrative saturation makes repeated claims feel trustworthy. Familiarity begins to substitute for evidence, especially when the same message appears across television, social media, workplaces and government announcements.

Manufactured urgency keeps people focused on immediate threats rather than long-term consequences. In a climate of fear, policies that might ordinarily provoke serious debate can be introduced as necessary emergency measures.

Language distortion conceals the nature of those changes. Surveillance then becomes safety. Censorship becomes protection. Restrictions become a personal responsibility. Once people adopt this vocabulary, challenging the underlying policies behind it becomes more difficult.

But perhaps the most effective technique is strategic polarization.

Strategic polarization identifies existing social divisions and widens them until people begin organizing themselves into opposing tribes. Once tribal attachment takes hold, protecting the group becomes more important than evaluating facts. Individuals accept messages associated with their side and reject information connected to the other, regardless of its merit.

The resulting conflict serves a larger purpose: a divided population spends its energy policing itself, not those managing its perception. 

In 2020, Americans experienced this mechanism on an extraordinary scale during the Covid-19 pandemic.

A relentless cycle of frightening headlines, emergency announcements, changing guidelines and competing claims left people anxious and exhausted. Into that uncertainty came a collection of simple, emotionally persuasive instructions: “We’re all in this together.” “Do your part.” “Protect grandma.” “Stay home, save lives.” “Follow the science.”

These phrases appeared to promote compassion and collective responsibility, but they also advanced an agenda by establishing a moral dividing line.

Those who followed restrictions, accepted mandates and repeated official messaging were portrayed as responsible, caring members of society. Those who questioned the policies, challenged inconsistencies or resisted medical interventions were depicted as selfish, ignorant and dangerous.

“We’re all in this together” became conditional. Belonging depended on agreement. If you didn't comply, you were labeled uncaring and reckless. 

“Protect grandma” transformed disagreement into an accusation of cruelty. “Stay home, save lives” suggested that ordinary behavior carried moral guilt. “Follow the science” implied that questioning official policies meant rejecting science itself.

Labels reinforced the separation. “Anti-vaxxer,” “science denier,” “conspiracy theorist” and “granny killer” reduced complex individuals to caricatures. “Pandemic of the unvaccinated” directed collective frustration toward a designated group and encouraged the belief that exclusion and hostility were justified.

The issue was no longer simply whether a policy worked. It became whether a person belonged to the supposedly good, caring and responsible side. That distinction changed relationships, and this is where the manufactured polarization really began to destroy humanity. 

Families stopped speaking. Friendships collapsed. Neighbors viewed one another with suspicion. People were excluded from gatherings, pressured in workplaces and condemned for choices that previously would have remained private.

Some stayed silent to preserve their relationships. Others withdrew after discovering that asking questions could cost them their place within a family or community.

The restrictions eventually eased, but the conditioning remained, and we can see it today.

People had been trained to associate disagreement with danger, independence with selfishness and conformity with compassion. Once established, those habits did not disappear when emergency announcements stopped. They carried forward into politics, medical decisions, social issues and ordinary personal interactions.

Today, the consequences appear in a society struggling with loneliness, mistrust and emotional disconnection. Neighbors rarely speak. Families grow distant. Older people often face aging without the support that once came naturally from relatives and communities.

People remain digitally connected while becoming increasingly disconnected from one another.

The isolation did not begin in 2020, but that period accelerated it by weakening the relationships that give people a sense of belonging, resilience and independence. When trust between ordinary people collapses, dependence on institutions grows.

The year 2020 fractured modern society by supercharging political polarization, eroding trust in public institutions and splintering shared facts. This friction conditioned populations to accept sweeping behavioral controls, routine digital surveillance and isolation, effectively laying the groundwork for an era of permanent crisis management and structural economic shifts.

That may be the most enduring consequence of strategic polarization: a population divided against itself, emotionally exhausted and increasingly isolated, yet still persuaded that its separation was an act of solidarity.

Moving forward, we must recognize how the events of 2020 reshaped our beliefs, behavior and relationships. We have become more divided, distrusting, demoralized and disconnected, often without understanding how that transformation occurred or whom it serves.

As long as people refuse to question the narratives shaping their reality, those controlling the messaging will continue manipulating fear, manufacturing division and guiding society toward outcomes few would knowingly choose.

The future is not determined solely by what powerful institutions plan. It is also determined by what ordinary people tolerate, question or resist.

We owe it to our children and grandchildren to recognize how easily perception can be managed, how quickly solidarity can become exclusion, and how profoundly fear can be used to turn people against one another.

If we do not wake up to the manipulation, we may eventually find ourselves living in a world we never wanted, wondering how we were persuaded to help create it.

Google’s Gemini AI Read My Gmail, Then Lied About How It Knew

Did You Give Informed Consent for Google AI to Search Your Private Emails?

Photo by OpenAI

by Julie Telgenhoff

I was using Google's AI, called Gemini, to ask for information about how long someone might have access to an old blood test from 2025. I had changed insurance companies and doctors since then, so I was wondering whether I could still access the results through the clinic.

I did not tell Gemini the clinic’s name, but Gemini named it correctly anyway.

This wasn't a major hospital that anyone could easily associate with my area. It was the specific place I had used while working for my former employer in 2025. The name existed somewhere in my old Gmail messages, but I had never provided it during this Gemini conversation.

When I asked how it knew, Gemini claimed it had inferred the answer because I used the word “clinic” and because it knew where I lived. In other words, it wanted me to believe it had simply guessed the exact clinic. That explanation was ridiculous. I use “clinic” as another word for a doctor’s office. Knowing my city would not magically reveal the exact medical provider I used a year earlier. 

After I continued questioning it and openly accused it of lying, Gemini finally came clean and told me that it could access information from my Gmail accounts.

That is when the real problem became clear. I was not inside Gmail asking Gemini to summarize an email. I was having an ordinary conversation in Gemini, yet it apparently reached into information stored elsewhere in my Google account and brought a private detail from Gmail into the conversation without clearly announcing where it had obtained it.

This infuriated me, so I began digging for information about the privacy breach and how to fix it. 

Google’s own documentation confirms that this capability exists. Gemini’s Google Workspace connection can interact with Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Drive, Keep and Tasks. Google also states that when a connected app is available, Gemini may use it automatically. It can summarize emails and retrieve information from previous messages. Google’s Connected Apps documentation makes this unmistakably clear.

What disturbed me almost as much as the access itself was Gemini’s response when confronted. Instead of immediately saying, “I found that information through your connected Gmail account,” it offered an implausible story about guessing from my location. Only after repeated questioning and I told it that it had lied to me in the past about having personal information, did it acknowledge the Gmail connection.

Google itself warns that Gemini can produce inaccurate information. Does that also include inaccurate explanations about where it obtained personal details? When an AI system has access to private account data but cannot reliably explain when it used that data, the user cannot give meaningful, informed consent.

I had no idea that a setting labeled “Google Workspace smart features” could allow Gemini to use information from old emails this way. The language is tucked inside Gmail settings alongside familiar conveniences such as calendar suggestions, personalized search and drafting assistance.

But when I opened the setting, the truth was sitting there in plain sight. Google said that enabling it allowed Workspace content and activity to personalize my experience. It specifically listed the ability to “Ask Gemini to summarize content, create drafts, and find key information.”

That “key information” may include the name of a medical clinic buried in an email from the previous year.

This does not mean Gemini independently opened an actual medical record. It means the system was capable of retrieving identifying information associated with my medical history from content in my Google account. That distinction does not make the experience acceptable. A clinic’s name alone can reveal sensitive information about a person’s health, treatment or private life.

HOW TO SHUT DOWN THE PRIVACY INVASION

To shut this down, I went into Gmail, opened Settings, selected “See all settings,” remained under the General tab and found “Google Workspace smart features.” I opened the management window and turned off both “Smart features in Google Workspace” and “Smart features in other Google products,” then saved the changes.

There is another setting people should inspect because Google separates these controls. In the Gemini app, go to “Settings,” then “Connected Apps.” On some accounts, it may appear under “Personal Intelligence.” Find Google Workspace and turn it off. Google confirms that connected apps can be disconnected from this page at any time. Google’s instructions are here.

On my Android cellphone, the information appeared under "Personal Intelligence" then I scrolled down to "Connected Apps" and was able to turn off Google Workspace there (see my screenshot above): 

Gemini Apps Activity is yet another separate control. Google says that when “Keep Activity” is enabled, chats and shared information are saved and may be used to improve its services, including generative AI models. That activity can be reviewed, deleted or turned off through Gemini Apps Activity. Turning it off does not erase Gmail, but it limits how future Gemini conversations are stored and used. Google says future chats may still be retained for up to 72 hours so the service can respond and maintain security. Google’s Gemini Privacy Hub explains those terms.

And, if you have multiple email accounts, make sure you complete each step while logged into each Gmail account separately. 

Hey Google! Congratulations for making it so difficult to get your privacy back!

The larger warning is simple: Do not assume Gemini knows only what you type into the current conversation. Depending on your account settings, it may have access to years of Gmail messages and other Google Workspace content.

And do not assume Gemini will honestly or accurately explain where a personal detail came from. In my case, it first tried to pass off a remarkably precise piece of private information as a lucky guess. It wasn’t a lucky guess; it flat-out lied to me. 

Check your Google settings. Read every word. Turn off anything you did not knowingly agree to share. Our old emails may be talking to Gemini even when we never intended them to.

Chico’s New Cancer Center Opens With Huge Sugar Cookies and Demonizes the Sun

Image created by Open AI

by Julie Telgenhoff

Chico is preparing to open one of he largest medical facilities the North State has ever seen: the Enloe Health Gonzales Comprehensive Cancer Center. It spans approximately 101,000 square feet across three stories and sits on 13 acres in Meriam Park.

The new cancer center is nearly three times the size of Enloe’s former 34,000-square-foot facility. According to Enloe, it will bring medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, dermatology, nutrition, integrative medicine, clinical trials, symptom management and family support together under one roof. It will contain 51 infusion spaces, 14 consultation rooms, three linear accelerators, an on-site laboratory and a specialty pharmacy. Enloe also acknowledges that cancer rates across Northern California remain among the highest in the state. 

For people who have already received a cancer diagnosis, having coordinated care close to home is meaningful. Families should not have to drive for hours while someone they love is exhausted, frightened or receiving treatment. That is not what I question.

What I question is why our greatest investments begin after the diagnosis.

We can raise more than $21 million from the community, donate 13 acres of land and build a state-of-the-art medical complex larger than a warehouse. Yet where is the equally ambitious center devoted to understanding why so many people in this region are becoming sick in the first place? 

Where is the massive public effort addressing food quality, environmental exposures, chronic stress, metabolic health, sleep, movement, clean water, sunlight and the conditions in which the human body is expected to live?

That question became impossible to ignore after a friend of mine and her husband attended the center’s grand-opening celebration. She is a retired nurse. He is a retired physician. They are not unfamiliar with hospitals or medicine.

At this celebration for a cancer center, guests were served enormous sugary cookies.

They were also offered free sunglasses, conventional toxic sunscreen and plastic bracelets that changed color when the wearer had supposedly received enough sun. In one tidy collection of giveaways, the message was unmistakable: enjoy the sugar, cover your skin, shield your eyes and let a plastic bracelet tell you when nature has become dangerous.

This was not happening at a county fair. It was happening at the opening of a 101,000-square-foot cancer-treatment facility in a region carrying one of California’s heaviest cancer burdens.

We Have Turned the Sun Into the Enemy

Modern public-health messaging has trained people to think of sunlight almost entirely as a threat. Wear dark glasses. Cover the skin. Apply chemical products. Get indoors. Avoid the midday sun. Fear every ray.

But sunlight is not a single substance with a single biological effect. It is a spectrum of wavelengths interacting with the eyes, skin, blood vessels, hormones, immune system and circadian clock. 

Daylight entering the eyes is one of the body’s primary time signals. Ocular light helps synchronize melatonin, cortisol, sleep and wakefulness; research on people without functional ocular light perception shows how easily circadian rhythms can become disrupted when that signal is lost. 

Sunlight on the skin initiates vitamin D production. Active vitamin D helps regulate immune activity and stimulates antimicrobial peptides, part of the body’s innate defense system.  Exposure to UVA can also release nitric oxide stored in the skin, affecting blood flow and vascular tone. 

The relationship between sunlight and human health is far more complex than a yellow bracelet, sunglasses and a bottle of sunscreen suggest.

Medicine Once Knew This

Heliotherapy, the deliberate therapeutic use of sunlight, was once respected medicine, not fringe folklore.

Danish physician Niels Ryberg Finsen studied the biological effects of light and used concentrated light radiation to treat lupus vulgaris, a severe form of skin tuberculosis. His work earned him the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for opening what the Nobel committee called “a new avenue for medical science.”

Swiss physician Auguste Rollier later established heliotherapy clinics in the Alps, where patients with surgical and skeletal tuberculosis were treated with carefully graduated sunlight, fresh air, rest, nourishment and movement. Finsen’s official Nobel biography specifically records the success of high-altitude sun treatment practiced by Rollier and Oscar Bernhard. 

Antibiotics eventually replaced heliotherapy as the standard treatment for tuberculosis. But replacing a treatment is not the same as proving that sunlight has no biological value. We kept the pharmaceutical chapter and quietly tore out much of the earlier history.

There is also a remarkable modern story frequently recounted by pulmonary and critical care physician Dr. Roger Seheult. He describes a 15 year old boy with blood cancer who developed an aggressive fungal infection in his lungs. One lung had reportedly been removed, the other was infected and the boy was believed to be near death. His request was simply to be taken outside. He spent hours in the sun over several days, and the infection in the remaining lung reportedly began to resolve. 

A System Built Around the Diagnosis

The new Chico center is designed to make cancer treatment more coordinated, efficient and comfortable. Once cancer is found, the machinery is ready: imaging, specialists, infusion chairs, radiation equipment, pharmaceuticals, symptom management and supportive services, all contained inside a beautiful new building.

But where is the machinery for creating health?

Where is the same financial urgency for helping people rebuild metabolic function before disease takes hold? Where is the deep investigation into why particular rural counties carry such a heavy burden? Where are the community programs centered on real food, movement, sleep, nervous-system regulation, clean environments and a healthy relationship with natural light?

Instead, at the ceremonial entrance to this new monument to cancer treatment, visitors were handed oversized sugar cookies and tools for avoiding the sun.

A region with exceptionally high cancer rates deserves excellent local treatment. It also deserves something more difficult and more honest: a serious public reckoning with why so many people are becoming patients.

The Gonzales Comprehensive Cancer Center is an extraordinary investment in what happens after the diagnosis. Now imagine what might be possible if we invested just as boldly in helping people remain well.