The Song I Use to Reset My Energy

by Julie Telgenhoff, Creator of this blog, A Sheep No More

For more than a decade, one piece of music has been part of my reset button.

Whenever my energy feels scattered, when the noise of the world starts piling up in my head, or when life begins to feel heavy, I return to a recording by Elke Neher titled “Removing Entities, Energies, Thought Forms and Energy Parasites – Energetic/Frequency Meditation.” (don't be put off by the title)

And every single time I listen, the same thing happens.

• Goosebumps
• A strange surge of clarity
• A burst of calm energy returns

It's almost like someone opened a window inside my mind and let fresh air rush in.

Music has always had that ability. Long before modern science tried to explain it, humans understood that sound moves energy. Certain songs lift you up instantly. Others calm the nervous system. Some make you feel as if your entire body is vibrating in harmony with the rhythm.

This recording does exactly that for me.

According to the description accompanying the meditation, the audio was created to help remove energies, thought forms, or influences that may have attached themselves to us over time—things that don’t truly belong to us but can still affect how we think, feel, and act.

Whether someone interprets that spiritually, psychologically, or metaphorically doesn’t really matter.

The deeper message is simple: sometimes we carry things that aren’t ours.

• Ideas that were planted by others
• Fears that came from collective panic
• Emotions absorbed from the environment around us

Over time those influences can become so familiar that we mistake them for our own thoughts.

That’s when stepping back becomes powerful.

This meditation encourages listeners to focus on a symbol while the music plays, allowing the mind to relax while the frequencies do their work. The suggestion is not to fight whatever sensations arise—just observe them. Many people report emotional releases, shifts in mood, or simply a feeling of calm clarity afterward.

Think of it less as “removing entities” and more as cleaning house energetically.

Every day we absorb information, stress, expectations, and emotional residue from the world around us. Just like a computer needs occasional clearing of its cache, the human mind sometimes needs a reset.

Sound can help create that reset.

The recording also reminds listeners of something we rarely stop to consider: each of us is a unique being with our own inner signal. When outside noise piles up—social pressure, media chaos, other people’s projections—it becomes harder to hear that signal.

Clearing the static allows your own voice to come through again.

The instructions are simple: listen when you feel called to, allow whatever sensations arise, and drink plenty of pure water afterward. There’s no rigid schedule. Everyone’s experience will be different.

For me, it’s become a ritual I return to whenever I feel the world getting too loud.

Within minutes, something shifts.

The mind settles.

The energy lifts.

And the path forward suddenly feels a little clearer.

Music has that kind of power.

Sometimes the most profound reset doesn’t come from analyzing every problem.

Sometimes it comes from pressing play, closing your eyes, and letting the frequencies remind you who you were before all the  commotion showed up.

;

From War in Iran to Agenda 2030 — The Quiet Shift Most People Never Notice

Governments say the measures are temporary responses to fuel shortages. Critics, however, argue that crises often accelerate policy directions that were already being discussed.

by Julie Telgenhoff

A war halfway across the world blocks oil shipments and suddenly governments start encouraging people to stay home again to save fuel.

At first it sounds temporary, maybe even practical. 

But if you step back, a bigger pattern starts to appear.

Energy Crisis. Remote work. Electric car sharing. “15-minute cities.”

None of these changes arrive all at once. They appear slowly by one crisis, one policy, one adjustment at a time.

By the time people notice the direction things are moving, the system is already built.

So the real question isn’t whether these ideas exist.

The question is whether they’re happening naturally…
or whether crises' simply accelerate a plan that was already on the table.

When Crisis Meets Policy: How Big Shifts Rarely Happen Overnight

A recent post circulating in alternative media raised an interesting observation. Independent researchers are beginning to speculate that the conflict with Iran, whether intentional strategy or simply geopolitical chaos, could ripple through global oil markets in ways that reshape everyday life.

According to reports, disruption around the Strait of Hormuz, which normally carries roughly 20 percent of the world’s traded oil and gas, is already putting pressure on energy supplies. Governments in several regions have begun encouraging citizens to work remotely again. This time the motivation is not a pandemic but the need to reduce fuel consumption.

Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade recently called on businesses and citizens to help conserve energy by reducing unnecessary travel. Denmark’s energy minister echoed a similar message, suggesting that if driving is not essential, people should simply stay home.

On the surface, these policies sound practical. If fuel becomes scarce, reduce demand ...it's simple economics.

But when you step back and look at the larger pattern, something interesting appears.

Major societal shifts rarely arrive all at once. They happen slowly and almost invisibly.

It becomes one small adjustment here, a temporary policy there. An emergency measure that quietly becomes normal. And by the time people realize how much has changed, the new system is already in place.

This is where conversations about long term global planning frameworks like Agenda 2030 enter the discussion.

Agenda 2030, adopted by the United Nations in 2015, is a real policy framework built around sustainable development goals. Its focus includes urban design, energy transition, transportation changes, and reducing carbon emissions. None of this is hidden. Governments openly discuss these goals.

Critics, however, argue that some of the urban planning ideas connected to these goals, particularly the concept of the “15-minute cities,” could fundamentally change how people move, work, and live.

The idea of a 15-minute city sounds appealing on paper. Your work, groceries, healthcare, schools, and recreation are all located within a short walk, bike ride or electric self-driving vehicle. Traffic decreases. Emissions fall. Communities become more localized and potentially healthier.

Cities around the world are already experimenting with versions of this model.

But skeptics worry about what happens if convenience slowly turns into dependency.

If urban design shifts toward dense zones where most daily needs are local, private vehicle ownership becomes obsolete. Shared self-driving electric vehicles and bike lanes would gradually replace traditional car culture. Instead of owning transportation, people might simply rent access to it when needed.

Again, none of this happens overnight.

It unfolds through incentives, infrastructure changes, and policy responses to events such as energy shortages, climate targets, economic disruptions, or geopolitical conflicts and even global pandemics. 

And that brings us back to the Iran situation.

If global oil supply becomes unstable, governments naturally search for ways to reduce fuel demand. Remote work becomes one obvious tool. Fewer commutes mean less gasoline consumption.

But once systems begin to shift, once companies normalize remote work, once cities redesign streets to favor bikes over cars, and once people adapt to shared transportation, those changes often remain in place.

History shows that emergency policies frequently outlive the crisis that introduced them.

COVID accelerated remote work.

Energy shocks can accelerate transportation changes.

Climate policies can accelerate urban redesign.

Each step, viewed on its own, seems logical.

Together they begin to reshape the structure of everyday life.

Some people welcome this transition as necessary modernization. Others view it as the quiet construction of systems that could reduce individual independence and be turned into a small lock down zone. 

What history does show is that large societal transformations rarely arrive with a dramatic announcement.

They arrive quietly.

One policy at a time.

One crisis at a time.

One temporary solution at a time.

And by the time people start asking bigger questions, the system has already moved forward.

For those watching these patterns unfold, the conversation often turns toward resilience.

Reducing dependence on fragile systems.

Strengthening local networks.

Creating your own systems of barter. 

In other words, exit where possible and build where necessary.

Whether the current energy disruption becomes a temporary inconvenience or another step in a long term global transition remains to be seen. But if history is any guide, the biggest changes rarely appear all at once. They emerge slowly and almost quietly, until one day people look around and realize the world works very differently than it used to.

If this article peeked your interest, also see:

The Quiet Transition: Gold, BRICS, China’s Digital Prototype, and the Illusion of Global Conflict

Is There More to the Story Behind the ‘Possible’ Iranian Drone Strike Warning in California?

 

by Julie Telgenhoff

Beginning late night yesterday and today, 3/12/2026, mainstream media outlets revealed that an FBI bulletin had warned California law-enforcement agencies about intelligence suggesting Iran “aspired” to launch a drone attack from a vessel off the U.S. West Coast. The alert itself emphasized that officials had no details about timing, targets, or method, and described the information as unverified or cautionary.

At the same time, security around the Academy Awards in Hollywood was reported to be increasing ahead of the ceremony scheduled for March 15, 2026, even though officials said there were no credible threats against the event. 

Fear has always been one of the easiest levers to pull on the human mind. Long before algorithms and nonstop news cycles, researchers were already studying how quickly human behavior could be shaped by it. The Little Albert experiment became one of the most infamous examples. A baby with no natural fear of a white rat was repeatedly startled with a loud noise whenever the rat appeared. Eventually the rat alone triggered tears. The experiment revealed something simple and unsettling: once fear is associated with a symbol, the reaction can be triggered again and again.

A century later the environment looks different, but the psychological mechanics feel familiar.

Consider the way certain news stories are framed. A headline appears warning that California could face a drone strike if the United States carries out military actions against Iran. Gas prices are linked to political decisions. Officials appear on television declaring they are “on high alert” and “monitoring the situation.” The language is dramatic and emotionally charged. It paints a picture of danger forming somewhere just over the horizon.

Yet inside the reporting itself sits an important detail. In the video titled “FBI warns California of possible Iranian drone attack,” the word possible carries the entire premise of the story. The news segment mentions more than once that there has been no confirmation from either the FBI or the Academy Awards organization itself. Reporters state that they have “reached out” for confirmation. In the language of modern media, that single word—possible—creates a story while also providing its escape hatch. If nothing happens, the coverage can simply point back to the same word: it was only ever described as possible.

This type of framing tends to appear alongside other narratives already circulating through the news cycle. At the same time warnings about potential retaliation are discussed, coverage highlights heightened security around the upcoming Oscars ceremony. Barricades are mentioned. Surveillance measures are emphasized. Officials say they are monitoring developments.

For an event whose television audience has steadily declined dropping from over 57 million U.S. viewers in 1998 to record lows, including 18 million in 2025, that atmosphere suddenly restores a sense of significance. High security implies high stakes. High stakes attract curiosity. Even people who have not watched the ceremony in years may find themselves wondering what is going on.

Fear and attention travel together.

But something else interesting appears beneath the video itself: the comment section. In many cases the audience response reads less like panic and more like skepticism. One viewer jokes that the chances of such an event happening are “about the same as anyone being prosecuted over the Epstein files.” Another writes bluntly, “Why would the Oscars be targeted? Nobody watches.” Someone else observes, “Nice marketing for the Academy Awards show. Very clever.”

Other comments take a sharper tone, questioning logistics or the narrative itself. Some point out the geographic distance between Iran and California and wonder how such a strike would even occur. Others suggest the warning feels like a political attempt to frighten residents. A few go further, declaring the story an obvious inside operation.

Whether those commenters are correct or not is almost secondary to what their presence reveals. The tone is not one of automatic acceptance. Instead it reflects a growing instinct among many viewers to question how stories are framed and why certain narratives appear when they do.

In a media landscape saturated with alerts, warnings, and breaking news banners, audiences are gradually learning to read between the lines. The same fear signals that once captured attention instantly are now sometimes triggering a different reaction: scrutiny.

That shift may be the most important development of all. Because throughout history the one thing institutions—political, corporate, or media—have consistently feared is not disagreement, but awareness.

An awake population is a difficult population to manipulate.

Simple Ways to Calm Your Mind

 

Julie Telgenhoff

The mind has a strange habit of making small moments feel enormous. A single worry can grow until it fills the whole room. One sad thought can make the entire day feel heavy. Yet the human brain also has a remarkable ability to reset itself with very small actions. Sometimes the most effective ways to regain balance are surprisingly simple.

Many psychologists and therapists talk about something called pattern interruption. When the mind spirals into overthinking, panic, or stress, the brain is running a loop. Interrupting that loop with a physical or sensory action forces the brain to shift gears. It’s like nudging a spinning wheel so it moves in a new direction.

A few simple techniques can do exactly that.

When thoughts start racing, one helpful trick is grounding yourself in the present moment. Touch something cold and name five things you can see around you. The brain suddenly has to move from imagination back to observation. The mind resets because it’s forced to engage with the real world rather than the internal story it was building.

Sadness can also trap the mind in a downward spiral. Oddly enough, the body can help lead the mind out of it. Sitting upright, looking slightly upward, and smiling for twenty seconds may feel artificial at first, but the brain often follows the signals sent by the body. Changing posture and facial expression can shift emotional chemistry in ways people don’t expect.

Panic works a little differently. When panic rises, the brain’s alarm system is fully activated. One effective way to interrupt it is through a simple mental task. Counting backwards from one hundred by sevens forces the brain to switch from emotional response to calculation. That shift alone can help calm the nervous system.

Motivation is another mental hurdle many people face. When something feels overwhelming, the mind often shuts down before even starting. One surprisingly effective approach is the “two-minute rule.” Tell yourself you’ll only do the task for two minutes. Starting is usually the hardest part. Once momentum begins, the brain often keeps going.

Anger also has a strong physical component. Breath can regulate it quickly. Taking a slow breath in, holding briefly, then exhaling longer than the inhale signals the nervous system to calm down. The longer exhale tells the body it’s safe to relax.

Sometimes people feel lost or mentally scattered. Writing down three things you can control today can restore a sense of direction. It reminds the mind that even in chaos, some actions are still within reach.

Focus can also disappear when the brain is tired or overstimulated. Chewing gum might sound trivial, but studies have shown it can stimulate alertness and attention. Small sensory actions sometimes wake the brain up.

Feeling alone can be one of the heaviest emotions. In those moments, placing a hand on your chest and feeling your heartbeat can create a surprising sense of connection. It’s a quiet reminder that life is still moving through you, even when the world feels distant.

There are a few other simple techniques that can help when the mind is overwhelmed.

If anxiety is rising, stepping outside for even a few minutes can help reset the nervous system. Natural light, fresh air, and movement all send signals to the brain that it’s safe to relax.

If stress builds up during the day, writing thoughts down on paper can offload mental pressure. The brain stops trying to hold everything at once once it sees the thoughts physically recorded.

When hopelessness creeps in, the most helpful step is often the smallest one possible. Washing a dish, taking a short walk, or drinking a glass of water can gently break the paralysis that hopelessness creates.

These actions may seem simple, almost too simple. But the mind and body are deeply connected. Changing something physical—breath, posture, movement, attention—can change emotional patterns in ways that feel almost immediate.

The mind doesn’t always need a massive solution. Sometimes it just needs a small interruption to remember how to move forward again.

Who Benefits From Our Confusion, Anger, and Distrust?

 

Julie Telgenhoff

Something strange has happened to information.

Not long ago, people would hear a story and instinctively ask, Is that true? Today the first instinct is often different: Share it before anyone else does.

Scroll through any social feed and you can watch it happen in real time. A shocking headline appears. A meme with bold text and a dramatic image. A short clip taken out of context. Within minutes it’s moving through hundreds of feeds, passed along by people who never stopped to ask where it came from.

It isn’t that people suddenly became careless. It’s that the environment around us changed.

Modern information moves faster than our ability to evaluate it.

Part of the problem is simply human nature. Our brains are wired to react to emotion. Anything that triggers anger, fear, outrage, or vindication lights up the same part of the mind that responds to immediate danger. When a piece of information hits those emotional buttons, the urge to pass it along becomes almost automatic. Sharing feels like participation. It feels like being part of something important.

But there’s another layer to the story.

In the modern world, information itself has become a battlefield.

Governments, corporations, political groups, and advocacy organizations all understand that controlling narratives can shape public perception. Sometimes that influence looks obvious such as advertising campaigns, press releases, or sponsored content. Other times it’s more subtle. A mixture of true facts, selective framing, and misleading conclusions can create stories that feel believable even when they distort reality.

One of the oldest persuasion techniques is surprisingly simple: mix truth and falsehood together.

When a message contains elements that are real, people are more likely to accept the parts that aren’t. Over time this blending creates confusion. People start arguing over fragments of truth wrapped inside exaggeration or distortion. The result isn’t clarity. It’s confusion layered on top of confusion.

And when that confusion grows strong enough, something else happens.

People begin to doubt their own ability to tell the difference.

At that point the problem is no longer just misinformation. It becomes a crisis of trust. If every claim seems questionable, many people stop trying to sort it out at all. They retreat into the comfort of whatever story aligns with their identity, their group, or their worldview.

That’s when information stops being about understanding and starts becoming about belonging.

People quietly drift into identity camps. Not always because they are certain the information is correct, but because the belief has become tied to who they are and who they stand with. We see it across the political spectrum today with online communities rallying around slogans, movements, or leaders where questioning the narrative can feel like betrayal. Once that happens, changing the information feels like changing sides. Facts stop being evaluated on their merit and instead get filtered through loyalty. If the story supports the tribe, it gets shared. If it challenges the tribe, it gets dismissed. Over time the camps harden, conversations become arguments, and the original question—what is actually true—gets buried under the need to defend a side.

Eventually another consequence appears. When people feel like truth is impossible to find, many simply disengage. The constant noise, contradictions, and arguments become exhausting. Instead of sorting through it, they step away altogether. The search for understanding gets replaced with a quiet sense of helplessness and hopelessness. 

The irony is that the antidote to all of this is not complicated.

It starts with slowing down.

Before sharing a claim, ask where it came from. Look for original sources instead of screenshots or cropped images. Notice when a headline is designed to provoke a strong emotional reaction. Ask a simple but powerful question: Who benefits if I believe this immediately?

None of these steps guarantee perfect truth. But they create space between reaction and understanding.

In a world flooded with information, the most radical act may be something very simple: refusing to become part of the noise.

Because every time someone pauses, checks a source, and chooses accuracy over outrage or shock and awe, something important happens. A small piece of clarity returns to a very crowded room.

And clarity comes to those who move quietly, think carefully, and remain patient.

The Quiet Path: Why Silencing the Mind Reveals Where Life Is Leading You

 

Julie Telgenhoff

The world we live in now is loud in a way humans were never designed for. Noise no longer just comes from traffic or busy streets. It pours out of screens, notifications, televisions, endless scrolling, breaking news banners, political outrage, and the constant pull to react to something. Every moment is filled. Every silence is quickly patched with a podcast, a video, a message, or another headline.

In that constant signal storm, something subtle gets buried. The quiet inner signal that once guided people.

The phrase “silence the mind so your path may be revealed” speaks to a truth that many people feel but rarely practice anymore. Human beings are not simply biological machines reacting to stimuli. We are spiritual awareness operating through a physical body. The body has rhythms, the nervous system has limits, and the mind needs quiet space to process and align with deeper intuition.

When the mind is constantly stimulated, that inner guidance system becomes impossible to hear.

Modern life floods the nervous system with artificial signals. Phones vibrate in our pockets. Wi-Fi networks blanket our homes. Screens glow late into the night. News cycles feed fear and urgency. Even moments of rest are filled with digital noise. Over time the body adapts to this constant stimulation by staying in a low-grade stress response. The nervous system never fully settles. Sleep becomes lighter. Thoughts race more easily. Many people describe feeling scattered, anxious, or unable to focus.

This isn’t simply psychological. It is physiological. The body’s regulatory systems—hormones, brain waves, and cellular communication—depend on cycles of activity and stillness. When stillness disappears, so does balance.

Silence restores that balance.

When the mind becomes quiet, something remarkable begins to happen. Thoughts slow down. The body shifts out of fight-or-flight and into a calmer parasympathetic state. Breathing deepens. The senses become sharper. Instead of reacting to everything around us, we begin noticing what actually matters.

That is often when people suddenly recognize the direction their life wants to move.

Paths rarely reveal themselves in chaos. They emerge in quiet awareness.

Nature is one of the most powerful ways to return to that quiet state. A forest, a field, a beach, or even a quiet park carries a different frequency than the human-built environment. The sounds of wind, birds, insects, and water have rhythms the nervous system recognizes as safe and natural. Spending time in those environments gradually unwinds the overstimulation created by modern life.

Even short periods help.

A twenty-minute walk without a phone can reset mental clarity more than hours of passive entertainment. Sitting outside in the early morning before the world wakes up often brings insights that never appear while scrolling through a screen. Many people notice that creative ideas, solutions to problems, or new life directions arrive during those quiet moments.

Silence does not have to mean isolation from the world. It simply means choosing moments where nothing is competing for attention.

A few small practices can create that space.

Set aside time each day where the phone is off and the mind is allowed to wander. Leave the television dark in the evening and sit quietly with a cup of tea. Step outside and listen to natural sounds instead of digital ones. Take slow breaths and allow thoughts to settle instead of chasing them.

At first the silence can feel uncomfortable. Many people realize how dependent they have become on constant stimulation. But after a few days something shifts. The nervous system softens. Focus improves. Sleep deepens.

And gradually, a quieter voice begins to appear beneath the noise.

It is the voice that has always been there. The one that recognizes what is meaningful, what is draining, and which direction life is trying to move.

When the mind becomes silent enough, the path does not have to be forced.

It reveals itself.

“The Silent Damage of 2020: What We Still Haven’t Fixed”

 

by Julie Telgenhoff

For a brief moment in early 2020, the world paused. Streets emptied. Schools closed. Grandparents waved through windows. What began as a public-health response slowly became something deeper — a psychological shift that many people still feel but struggle to describe.

It wasn’t just a virus that moved through society. It was fear.

The language changed first. “Social distancing” became normal speech, even though the phrase itself quietly carried a strange message: other humans were suddenly a danger. For generations people had been taught the opposite — that community, touch, and proximity were part of what made life meaningful. Overnight those instincts were reframed as reckless.

Many elderly people experienced the harshest edge of that shift. Across the world, parents and grandparents were isolated in hospitals and care facilities, sometimes dying without the presence of family. Children who had grown up visiting them suddenly learned that love meant staying away. Even years later, many families still carry the quiet guilt and grief from those decisions.

Young people were also pulled into an unfamiliar reality. Graduation ceremonies vanished. Classrooms moved onto screens. For some students, remote learning worked fine. For others it was devastating. Motivation dropped, grades slipped, and the natural social rhythm of growing up shifted. Friendships became awkward conversations, learning how to interact with peers was interrupted during years when those lessons matter most.

Teachers later reported something many parents had already noticed: students returning to classrooms with weaker social skills, shorter attention spans, and higher anxiety. The habits of isolation had left a mark.

Even the youngest generation experienced the world differently. Babies born during that period saw adults with covered faces everywhere they went. Facial expressions such as smiles, curiosity, concern are one of the primary ways infants learn to interpret human emotion. Pediatric researchers have begun studying whether long periods of masked interaction affected early emotional development and language cues. It’s too early to draw firm conclusions, but the question itself shows how unusual those years were.

Meanwhile, the cultural divide widened.

Masks, vaccines, lockdowns — each became identity markers rather than simply health choices. Families argued. Friends stopped speaking. Social media amplified the tension until entire communities split into camps of “us” and “them.” Instead of a shared crisis, many people felt like they were living inside competing realities.

Trust in institutions, media, neighbors, even relatives eroded in ways that may take years to repair.

But the deeper wound may be something harder to measure: the sense that human connection itself became fragile.

People hesitate more now. Conversations feel guarded. Loneliness statistics have climbed. Many describe the same quiet feeling — that the emotional “energy” of society shifted during those years and never fully returned to what it was.

The good news is that human cultures have always healed from disruption. The rebuilding rarely happens through policy or headlines. It happens slowly, person by person.

It happens when families gather again without fear.

When neighbors talk instead of argue.

When children play together outside rather than through screens.

When people remember that disagreement does not require hatred.

Community isn’t something governments can manufacture. It’s something people practice.

The strange years of isolation reminded the world how essential connection really is. If anything positive emerges from that period, it may be a renewed awareness that human beings were never meant to live separated from one another.

Rebuilding that sense of trust and belonging may take time. But every shared meal, every handshake, every honest conversation is a small step toward restoring something that once came naturally.

And perhaps still can again.