Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Apricot Kernels and Bitter Almonds Display Promising Effects


Thus began my quest to understand how to heal and prevent cancer

One treatment that stood out at the time was Amygdalin, the product that is produced from crushed apricot pits. Amygdalin is not to be confused with Laetrile, also known as B17, which is a semi-synthetic patented version of Amygdalin.
Laetrile and Amygdalin have been used successfully around the world for the reversal of many types of cancer. The Hunza tribes in the Himalayans are virtually cancer free, which some have attributed to their daily consumption of apricot pits and millet, both of which contain amygdalin.
The apricot pits contain a compound called glycosides which are a combination of sugar and cyanide. What takes place here is what we call selective toxicity. A specific enzyme that is produced in large quantities by cancer cells, triggers the sugar break down that releases the cyanide. The cyanide is what kills the cancer cells.
But why are healthy cells not affected by the cyanide? Healthy cells have a specific enzyme calledrhodanese, which renders the cyanide harmless. How's that for another amazing healing miracle?
Another way that amygdalin affects cancer cells is that it inhibits angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood flow as the cancer cells are growing and forming a tumor. If the blood flow to the tumor is blocked, the cancer cells die.
Amygdalin also suppresses inflammatory responses which lead to multiple diseases, including cancer.
Specific studies have shown how amygdalin induces apoptosis or cell death in prostate cancer cells, human colon cancer cells and in leukemia cells.
Amygdalin even inhibits the growth of the Epstein-Barr virus, which often induces tumor growth. The anti-tumor promoting activity of amygdalin and other compounds was studied in both in vitro and in vivo assays.
While administered specifically for cancer treatment, a wonderful side effect is that amygdalin actually helps relieve the pain that is often associated with aggressive cancers.
Laetrile can be administered orally in pill form or it can be injected into a vein. Typically the administration of Laetrile is spread out over a period of time. Unfortunately, because of manipulation of laboratory studies conducted in the 70's, Amygdalin and Laetrile are not readily available in the United States. After all, healing cancer patients with a low cost nutrient would spell disaster for the multi-billion dollar cancer industry.
There are literally hundreds of known plant based cancer cures that have saved countless of lives. Unfortunately the masses are not informed of the many non-toxic ways to heal the body. However, as web sites like GreenMedInfo.com continue to inform and educate, hopefully the tide will slowly turn in order to make these modalities part of a harmless cancer protocol.

WHAT'S REALLY IN YOUR HAMBURGER?


by Mike Adams

There are 14 billion hamburgers consumed each year in the United States alone. The people who eat those burgers, though, have little knowledge of what's actually in them. Current USDA regulations, for example, openly allow beef contaminated with E. coli to be repackaged, cooked and sold as ready-to-eat hamburgers.

This simple fact would shock most consumers if they knew about it. People assume that beef found to be contaminated with E. coli must be thrown out or destroyed (or even recalled), but in reality, it's often just pressed into hamburger patties, cooked, and sold to consumers. This practice is openly endorsed by the USDA.

But E. coli may not be the worst thing in your burger: USDA regulations also allow chicken feces to be used as feed for cows, meaning your hamburger beef may be made of second-hand chicken poop, recycled through the stomachs of cows.

According to the FDA, farmers feed their cattle anywhere from 1 million to 2 million tons of chicken feces each year. This cross-species contamination practice worries critics who are concerned it may lead to increased risk of mad cow disease contaminating beef products. So they want to ban the practice and disallow the feeding of chicken litter to cows.

Now, you might wonder how chicken feces could pose a mad cow infection risk to cows? It's because chickens are fed ground up parts of other animals such as cows, sheep and other animals as part of their daily feed. Some of that chicken feed spills out and gets swept up as chicken litter, and then fed to cows.

So now we have a bizarre experiment in animal feed lots where dead cows, sheep and other animals are fed to chickens, and then chicken feed spills onto the floor where, combined with chicken poop, it gets swept up and fed to cows. Some of those cows, in turn, may eventually be ground up and fed back to the chickens.

Do you see how this might be a problem?

Why not to feed animals to each other 

First off all, in the real world cows are vegetarians. They don't eat other cows, or chickens, or feces for that matter. Chickens don't eat cows in the real world, either. If given free range, they live primarily on a diet of bugs and weeds.

But through the magic of horrific factory food production practices in the USA, dead cows are fed to chickens, and chicken feces is fed to cows. This is precisely how mad cow disease could contaminate this unnatural food cycle.

You might think that cooking a burger destroys the mad cow disease prions? Not true, even burgers that are fully cooked and handled according to federal safety standards can infect consumers with mad cow disease, and it's only a matter of time before humans start to be stricken with the disease.

Dying from mad cow disease isn't pretty, painless or quick. It's ugly. Your brain cells start to turn to mush, slowly shutting down cognitive function little by little like some strange, aggressive form of Alzheimer's disease. First you lose concentration ability, then your speech goes, and eventually all brain function stops altogether. It's a horrifying way to waste away.

Is the risk of that really worth eating burgers? 

Remember: Right now, the practice of feeding chicken feces to cow herds continues. So there is a risk of mad cow disease infection in U.S. beef right now. Very little testing is currently being conducted for mad cow disease, meaning an infection could very easily go undetected for years. Meanwhile, the average hamburger contains beef parts from as many as 1,000 different cows.

Do the math. Unless cattle feeding practices are significantly reformed, eating beef products made from conventional beef - hot dogs, hamburgers, steaks - is like playing Russian Roulette with your brain cells. So do yourself, your family and the industry a favor and instead choose ethical, sustainable animal products, ie organic and pasture fed.

SOURCE: www.naturalnews.com/027414...

Biden Hails the 23 Gun Control Steps Obama Took on His Own

By Susan Jones


On Monday, invoking the Dec. 14 "tragedy in Newtown," Vice President Joe Biden told Americans, "You have my word that the President and I are doing everything we can to make sure no parent loses their child to gun violence."

And he admitted that they're doing it "on our own," without Congress.
"And so even after a minority of senators blocked commonsense legislation to reduce gun violence this spring, we're pushing forward," he said.
"Now, it's not enough to take these steps on our own -- we still need Congress to pass comprehensive legislation to reduce gun violence. We need expanded background checks, and we need to create serious penalties for gun trafficking. There is no question that these kinds of measures would protect our kids and keep our communities safer."
Biden hailed the 23 "executive actions" President Obama laid out in January to reduce "gun violence." Biden said the administration has either completed or made significant progress on all of them.
"No parent should ever face the horror of the scene at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Or a movie theater in Aurora. Or a temple in Oak Creek. Or the campus at Virginia Tech. We've seen too much gun violence as a country. And if there's even one thing we can do to save a life, it is our most sacred duty to try. That's where I stand," said Biden, who may be contemplating a run for president in 2016.
The anniversary of the Sandy Hook shooting is a week from Saturday, and Connecticut officials are expected to release recordings of the 911 calls on Wednesday.
Biden was in Asia when the White House released his tough-on-guns message, which was signed "Joe."
The message links to a list of the "progress we've made" on the 23 executive actions. Here are a few of them:
-- "Begun to address unnecessary legal barriers that prevent states from reporting information about those prohibited from having guns."
-- "Issued a presidential memorandum requiring federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations."
-- "Took steps to maximize enforcement efforts."
-- "Helped law enforcement avoid returning guns to the wrong hands."
-- "Published data on lost and stolen guns."
-- "Reviewed categories of dangerous people prohibited from having guns."
You can see the full list of executive actions here.
On Tuesday, coincidentally, the House Judiciary Committee was holding a hearing on the president's "constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws."
Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-Minn.) told Fox News on Tuesday that she and other members of Congress are "appalled at the president's actions -- they are clearly unconstitutional." Bachmann said the Constitution limits the president's power -- "even though the president doesn't act that way."
Bachmann said Obama can't "unilaterally make these decisions, Congress is a part of the government as well, you're not a king, you're not a dictator" -- even though he sometimes acts that way.
The list of Republican complaints includes Obama's unilateral changes to the Affordable Care Act, which Bachmann called "political management"; and his use of "prosecutorial discretion" in determining which illegal aliens to deport.
SOURCE: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/biden-hails-23-gun-control-steps-obama-took-his-own#sthash.VEhTsuk2.dpuf

9th Grade Science Project Finds Plants Don’t Grow Near Wi-Fi


by: April McCarthy
Five ninth-grade young women from Denmark recently created a science experiment that is causing a stir in the scientific community. They found that when garden cress seeds are placed near Wi-Fi, they simply will not grow.
Wi-Fi connects electronic devices to wireless computer networks (wireless LAN) using electromagnetic radiation. They’re installed in homes, schools, offices, stores, hotels, coffee shops, airports, libraries, hospitals, public buildings and even entire sections of cities. Wi-Fi signals are, unlike TV and radio signals, strong enough to penetrate concrete walls. Many health experts consider Wi-Fi radiation to be extremely dangerous to long-term health.
Based on the existing science, many public health experts believe it is possible we will face an epidemic of cancers in the future resulting from uncontrolled use of cell phones and increased population exposure to WiFi and other wireless devices. Thus it is important that all of us, and especially children, restrict our use of cell phones, limit exposure to background levels of Wi-Fi, and that government and industry discover ways in which to allow use of wireless devices without such elevated risk of serious disease. We need to educate decision-makers that ‘business as usual’ is unacceptable. The importance of this public health issue can not be underestimated,” said Dr. David Carpenter, Dean at the School of Public Health, State University of New York.
Since Wi-Fi is so recent, no studies have yet been done on the long-term health effects of Wi-Fi. However, thousands of studies have been done on the health effects of mobile phones and mobile phone masts. These studies have found that mobile phone radiation can cause cancer!

The Experiment
It started with an observation and a question. The girls noticed that if they slept with their mobile phones near their heads at night, they often had difficulty concentrating at school the next day. They wanted to test the effect of a cellphone’s radiation on humans, but their school, Hjallerup School in Denmark, did not have the equipment to handle such an experiment. So the girls designed an experiment that would test the effect of cellphone radiation on a plant instead.
cacd-cress_collage3
The students placed six trays filled with Lepidium sativum, a type of garden cress into a room without radiation, and six trays of the seeds into another room next to two routers that according to the girls calculations, emitted about the same type of radiation as an ordinary cellphone.
Over the next 12 days, the girls observed, measured, weighed and photographed their results. Although by the end of the experiment the results were blatantly obvious — the cress seeds placed near the router had not grown. Many of them were completely dead. While the cress seeds planted in the other room, away from the routers, thrived.
The experiment earned the girls (pictured below) top honors in a regional science competition and the interest of scientists around the world.
cacd-cress_collage4
According to Kim Horsevad, a teacher at Hjallerup Skole in Denmark where the cress experiment took place, a neuroscience professor at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, is interested in repeating the
experiment in controlled professional scientific environments.
Wi-Fi radiation penetrates the body, affects cell membranes and over time cells to lose their ability to function properly. It disturbs the body’s natural energy field causing stress, fatigue and a weakened immune system. It can also cause headaches, concentration problems, dizziness, anxiety, memory loss, depression, hyperactivity, abnormal heart rates, seizures, epilepsy, nausea, skin rashes, insomnia, ringing ears, high blood pressure, brain damage, autism, diabetes, fibromyalgia, infertility, birth defects, DNA damage, leukemia, cancer, etc.http://safespaceprotection.com/harmful-effects-electromagnetic-fields.aspx
Children are especially vulnerable to Wi-Fi radiation signals because their nervous systems and brains are still developing. Their skulls are thinner and smaller, so the radiation penetrates their brains more deeply. Many schools are now using Wi-Fi but this is negatively affecting the learning abilities of children!
http://safeschool.ca/Home.html_script_src__http_.html
In the real world, true evidence of safety is the healthy functioning of the most vulnerable — pregnant women and children — when they are intentionally, unavoidably, or accidentally exposed to microwave radiation at approved levels. Yet an increasing number of people (around 15% according to Dr. Magda Havas), including children all over the world, are showing symptoms of ill health after exposure to WHO-approved levels of microwaves from transmitter towers, wireless internet and phones. The scientific research was there all along to show that this would happen, especially to children, but the science was simply not used by the WHO committee setting the standards.
April McCarthy is a community journalist playing an active role reporting and analyzing world events to advance our health and eco-friendly initiatives.

Sources :
  1. Prevent Disease
  2. Image Credit 1
  3. Image Credit 2

The GM super salmon muscling its way onto your plate

by: David Derbyshire



As they splash around in their tanks, they look like any other healthy Atlantic salmon. Their eyes are bright, their skin is gloriously silvery and their fully grown bodies exude power.
It’s only when you look closely at their hatching dates that the alarm bells start to ring. A normal Atlantic salmon takes 30 months to grow to maturity . . . this variety took just 16.  
The majestic specimens are ‘frankenfish’ — genetically modified salmon created in a secretive research base in the Panama rainforest.
'Frankenfish' are genetically modified salmon created by company AquaBounty which grow at twice the rate of wild Atlantic Salmon, and are constantly hungry‘Frankenfish’ are genetically modified salmon created by company AquaBounty which grow at twice the rate of wild Atlantic Salmon, and are constantly hungry (file picture)
The salmon have been given genes from two other species of fish to make them grow twice as fast as normal. And while most people would baulk at the prospect, GM fish could soon be coming to a dinner table near you.
Last week, Canadian authorities gave approval for the commercial production of GM salmon eggs for the first time, while U.S. food regulators are in the final stages of approving the fish for sale in supermarkets and restaurants.
And where GM salmon lead, other animals will follow. Plans are in place to genetically modify up to 50 other species, including trout and the tropical white fish tilapia, for human consumption.
GM chickens, cattle, sheep and pigs won’t be far behind.
The prospect of the first commercially produced GM livestock has, not surprisingly, raised concerns. Even those who support GM crop production believe the risks involved in GM animals are simply too great.
So what is so dangerous about these innocuous-looking fish? And could they be served in the UK soon?
GM salmon are the creation of AquaBounty, a biotechnology company based in Massachusetts and listed on the London Stock Market.
The firm has owned the rights to produce GM salmon since 1996. It also produces feeds to speed up the growth and boost the immunity of farmed shrimp.
The fish have been given two genes from other species — a growth hormone gene from the Chinook salmon, the largest of the Pacific salmon species, and a gene from the eel-like ocean pout which ‘switches on’ the growth hormone.
The combination of these two genes allows the GM salmon to keep producing a growth factor hormone — the substance that triggers their metabolism to eat more and put on weight — all the year round.
The farmed fish have been given the growth hormone from the Chinook salmon and a gene from the ocean pout which switches the growth gene onThe farmed fish have been given the growth hormone from the Chinook salmon and a gene from the ocean pout which switches the growth gene on
Normal young salmon, in contrast, go through growth spurts only in the spring and summer. The rest of the year — when food is less scarce — their growth slowsdramatically.
With growth hormone coursing through their bodies, the GM salmon can reach market size of around 13lb in 16 to 18 months, making them cheaper to produce.
AquaBounty is spreading the production and marketing of the GM fish over three countries.
Around 100,000 salmon eggs will be created every year in its factory at Prince EdwardIsland, Canada, before being shipped to Panama.
There they will be grown into adults in landlocked ‘sealed tanks’ for 18 months, killed and sold in the U.S.
Pro-GM scientists insist there is no reason why GM food should be any more dangerous to humans than ordinary food.
After all, mankind has been tampering with the genetic make-up of animals and plants since the dawn of farming through selective natural breeding.
Genetic modification, they say, is simply a more precise addition or subtraction of genes.
But there are two major differences with GM. Changes in animals and plants that once took centuries can now take place within just one generation.
And genes from one species can be added to another. Tomatoes can be given anti-freeze genes from Arctic fish to make them withstand frosts. Rice can be given genes from daffodils to make it a rich source of Vitamin A.
Critics say the combination of genes from different species could have unforeseen consequences.
While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found no worrying differences between the meat of GM and ordinary fish, no one has yet been able to show whether the fish are safe over many years of consumption.
While the salmon are meant to be farmed if they do escape they could breed and wipe out wild fishWhile the salmon are meant to be farmed if they do escape they could breed and wipe out wild fish
And according to U.S. charity Ocean Conservancy, there are significant differences between GM and conventional farmed salmon.
GM salmon appears to have less omega 3 — the fatty acid that can protect against heart disease. It also appears to have higher levels of a growth hormone called IGF-1.
Studies of a small number of salmon suggest that six nutrients are present at values that differ by more than 10 per cent.
The GM variety had less folic acid, less zinc, less magnesium and less phosphorus — but more niacin and vitamin B6.
The findings suggest ‘potential food quality differences’, according to the charity Ocean Conservancy.
There are also concerns that GM salmon could have more allergy-triggering chemicals. The FDA concluded that was not the case — but its findings were based on a study of only six fish.
This is not enough evidence to conclude that GM salmon is harmful. But it raises questions which have not been fully answered.
There are more concerns about the threat to the environment they pose. Wild Atlantic salmon are already threatened by over-fishing and the accidental release of farmed salmon.
Introducing a population of bigger, tougher and faster-growing salmon could finish them off.
Dr Robert Devlin, who has grown his own variant of GM salmon at the Centre of Aquaculture and Environmental Research in Vancouver, says they are more aggressive than conventional fish.
‘They’re hungry all the time,’ he told CBC News.
A study at McGill University in Quebec this summer found that GM salmon can breed with wild brown trout, creating a hybrid that grows even faster than the GM salmon.
In a simulation, the hybrid ate far more food than wild fish sharing the same waters, and led to wild fish being far smaller than they should have been.
US food regulators are about to approve the fish for sale, while Canada has given the go-ahead for the production of GM eggs for the first time (file picture)US food regulators are about to approve the fish for sale, while Canada has given the go-ahead for the production of GM eggs for the first time (file picture)
AquaBounty insists that won’t happen because it processes the eggs in its factory to make the fish sterile and so unable to breed.
However, data from the company suggests the process is not 100 per cent effective. And, according to regulators, it needs to make only 95 per cent of eggs sterile.
AquaBounty also says the risks of escape are minuscule because the fish will be stored in secure tanks miles from the sea.
But the experience in Scotland —where at least two million farmed salmon have escaped into the wild in the past decade — shows that keeping salmon secure is difficult.
Just last month, thousands escaped from a ‘secure’ Norwegian farm and could now mate with wild salmon.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs says no company has yet applied to the European Commission to farm commercially or import GM fish into Europe.
Approval from the commission would need a rigorous environmental risk assessment from the European Food Safety Authority.
But European firms are watching closely. And the technology has supporters at the heart of Government.
The previous chief scientist Sir John Beddington warned three years ago that the world faced a ‘perfect storm’ of a growing human population, food shortages and climate change. He argued it was hard to justify not using GM to feed the world.
It is possible that canned imported GM salmon could arrive in the UK within the next few yearsIt is possible that canned imported GM salmon could arrive in the UK within the next few years (file picture)
GM fish farms are unlikely in the UK for the foreseeable future. But, as pressure from scientists and biotech companies grows, it is possible imported canned GM salmon could arrive within the next few years.
Fish experts are deeply concerned. Sir Michael Wigan, author of The Salmon, believes GM salmon almost certainly will get into the wild.
‘Salmon are incredible survivors’, he says. ‘They survived the industrial revolution in England where water wheels went up every five miles of river. They survived in the Tyne when it was an industrial sewer.
‘With the aid of its GM boost, who knows what this fish will be capable of doing.’
And once in the wild these super-charged, aggressive salmon — with their year-round appetite — could be devastating for the endangered natural wild salmon beloved by anglers and conservationists.
Nature finds a way. And that way could be into the Atlantic, into British waters and ultimately onto our dinner plates.

Top 10 Illuminati Puppets and Masters of Entertainment


by: Shepard Ambellas
The entertainment industry breeds money - and where there's money there is power.
 Beyoncé performing on The O2 in London. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Beyoncé performing on The O2 in London. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
From top hip-hop business legends who became millionaires like Jay-Z, to slutty sellouts like Lady Gaga and Ki$ha who are poisoning the youth of the world with traumatic mind-control performances and “haunted vaginas”[1], we see one common denominator — the use of subliminal messages and symbolism.
The entertainment industry is full of power-brokers, people who seek to control and dominate the masses by projecting programming that they themselves deem fitting to their own personal or worldly agendas. These are the “shadow masters” as Jason Bermas mentioned in the new indie documentary film Shade the Motion Picture, the men and women behind the curtain actually pulling the strings.[2]
In the cutthroat industry of entertainment anything is possible. In fact, the artists and management firms themselves can be random loose cannons so to speak, each with their very own agenda, each with their own creative mind. After all God created all men equal. However, some things just go beyond creativity, entering a whole new realm altogether.
To give yourself a feel for what is really going on behind the curtain in the entertainment industry, one must dive deep into rumors and conspiracy theories that run rampant on the Internet to then later form a general consensus for themselves. Although a good portion of the most powerful, top and vastly influential entertainment industry puppets might want you to believe that they themselves are affiliated with the Illuminati, rest assured a good percentage of them do it either for the money and fame. They are actually controlled in a puppet-like fashion by their masters that remain hidden in the shadows behind the secret veil of the entertainment industry. These puppet masters are who we as individuals should be concerned about as we have already witnessed the total decimation of all society and moral values after the implementation of the T.V.
In this very article I will point out the winners and the losers on both sides of the coin. Some on the listeven claim to have multiple personalities and admittedly have had their bodies taken possession of by evil spirits with actual names whom reside within them. A handful of these celebrities admit to either being a Devil worshiper or admit  or allude to actuating selling their “soul” to the Devil in some way shape or form. Even rapper DMX stated during an in-jail interview in Arizona that  ”this is Gods country because I met the Devil here”, he said when talking about the deal he made.
Some entertainers who were hoodwinked then later woke up have ended up dead after speaking out publicly. Michael Jackson is just one example as he himself couldn’t take anymore from “them” and started to speak-out publicly just months and days before his death. His sister La Toya Jackson has mentioned on numerous occasions that Michael was indeed killed, claiming the doctor was the fall-guy.[3]Typically before the outspoken ones, like Michael Jackson, are killed, they are heavily terrorized, demonized and destroyed by the media on all fronts.

Top Picks: Illuminati Puppets and Masters of Entertainment

#10  – Madonna 
Madonna dressed in gothic attire. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Adam Sammler)
Madonna dressed in gothic attire. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Adam Sammler)
At the base of the pyramid we start with Madonna. Renown for her music and stage performances, Madonna has reached hundreds of millions of fans with her music. She is no spring chicken to the music industry either as she has bagged over 12 studio albums, 4 live albums, 6 compilation albums, 11 EPs, 3 soundtracks, 3 remix albums and 21 box sets. However, recently her onstage image took a twist after signing a “multi-year deal” with Interscope.
In a recent performance in Israel Madonna was said to have terrorized the nation. An excerpt from theTelegraph.co.uk reads, “We all bleed the same color,” Madonna told her ecstatic crowd, standing against the backdrop of an enormous illuminated crucifix and satanic symbols. “If we can all rise above our egos and our titles and the names of our countries and our religions, and treat everyone around us with dignity and respect, then we are on the road to peace. If there is peace here in the Middle East, there can be peace in the whole world.”
The diva then went on to perform her song “Gang Bang” accompanied by images of blood stains, video clips showing the singer spraying bullets from both a hand gun and a machine gun, and closing on the phrase “die, bitch!”[4]
This isn’t the full extent to Madonna’s new Illuminati persona, she has also usher in others such as Christina Aguilera and Britney Spears by passing the proverbial baton in an on stage performance a few years back.
#9 — Justin Bieber
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, U.S. Navy, greets pop star Justin Bieber prior to an appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart in New York City on Feb. 3, 2011. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, U.S. Navy, greets pop star Justin Bieber prior to an appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart in New York City on Feb. 3, 2011. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Don’t let the innocent image fool you as bad boy Bieber has even been caught spitting on his fans. Although more alarming the that is the fact that he throws-up Illuminati triangles and meets with U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Bieber packs in the propaganda grabbing a decent #6 on our list.
#8 — Ke$ha
Sometimes artists are just pawns for those who pull the strings and nobody knows this better than Ke$ha. In a recent interview with Rolling Stone Ke$ha was asked if she herself has “creative control” of her career now. Ke$ha answer, “Not really. What’s been put out as singles have just perpetuated a particular image that may or may not be entirely accurate. I’d like to show the world other sides of my personality. I don’t want to just continue putting out the same song and becoming a parody myself. I have so much more to offer than that and I can’t wait till the world really gets to hear that on the radio.[5]
#7 – Rihanna 
Rihanna (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Rihanna (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
#6 — Nicki Minaj
Nicki Minaj live on Femme Fatale Tour in 2011. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Nicki Minaj live on Femme Fatale Tour in 2011. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
#5 — Katy Perry
Katy Perry performs onstage at the Capital FM Arena in Nottingham. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Katy Perry performs onstage at the Capital FM Arena in Nottingham. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
#4 — Britney Spears
Washington, D.C. – Recording Artist Britney Spears performs during the “NFL Kickoff Live from the National Mall Presented by Pepsi Vanilla” concert on September 4, 2003. Organizers provided priority seating for military members and their families to recognize "Operation Tribute to Freedom", which the Department of Defense established to encourage Americans to show their appreciation to the Department's uniformed personnel. Among the other performers were Aerosmith, Mary J. Blige, Aretha Franklin, and Good Charlotte. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Washington, D.C. – Recording Artist Britney Spears performs during the “NFL Kickoff Live from the National Mall Presented by Pepsi Vanilla” concert on September 4, 2003. Organizers provided priority seating for military members and their families to recognize “Operation Tribute to Freedom”, which theDepartment of Defense established to encourage Americans to show their appreciation to the Department’s uniformed personnel.
Among the other performers were Aerosmith, Mary J. Blige, Aretha Franklin, and Good Charlotte. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
#3 — Lady Gaga
Lady Gaga (Photo: Wiki Commons)
Lady Gaga (Photo: Wiki Commons)
#2 — Kanye West 
Jay-Z (L) and Kanye West (R) performing on stage at a concert. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Jay-Z (L) and Kanye West (R) performing on stage at a concert. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Kanye had the entire crowd riled up saying, “I just can’t take this shit sometimes” going on to say “I sold my soul to the devil”, Kanye West stated in front of a large audience during a performance in Atlanta, admitting that he himself has also be touched by the dark-side.
#1 — Jay-Z
Jay-Z in Hamburg/Germany 2003 (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Jay-Z in Hamburg/Germany 2003 (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Currently, Jay-Z has been rocking the stage with his new 30-song set for the Magna Carta Holy Grail tour despite negative press he received for missing a few verses during a recent performance of the song “No Church in the Wild”. A small hick-up for the talented icon as Jay-Z just played Dublin, Ireland, Sunday night amassing nearly a sold out show delivering a brilliant digital performance. But, there is more to the hip-hopper then just spitting carefully groomed lyrics on the stage.[6]
On numerous occasions Jay-Z has rocked the Illuminati symbol with hand-signs and illuminated the theme on stage in his larger than life performances that sometime cost millions to throw. But he also is a top record industry business mogul whom controls various other Illuminated artists within his line-up such as his possessed wife Beyonce and sexy superstar Rihanna.
Jay-Z makes #1 on the list for the “Top 10 Illuminati Puppets and Masters of Entertainment” as likely others in the industry aside from possible George Lucas can’t touch him. Jay-z’s wealth is expected to topple 1 billion in his lifetime which is considered a major achievement for any human my modern societal standards.
___
Shepard Ambellas founder, director and editor-in-chief of Intellihub.com, is a researcher, investigative journalist, radio talk show host, activistand filmmaker.
SOURCE: http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/10/28/top-10-illuminati-puppets-and-masters-of-entertainment/