Sunday, August 18, 2013

UK Man Wins Court Victory Over BBC for 9/11 Coverup Broadcast

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day. 

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

(VIDEO) Tony Rooke at the Magistrates' Court - BBC TV license

Below is the tape of the report absolutely showing that Building 7 is still standing while the BBC is reporting that it had collapsed. I can't wait to here the arguments from the people who still want to believe the "official" story on how this is possible. 

(VIDEO) BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE

And here is the video that debunks NIST's "official version" of the collapse of Building 7.

(VIDEO) 9-11: Sound Evidence for WTC 7 Explosions and NIST Cover Up

Time to wake up!

Follow us @ and

No comments:

Post a Comment