Saturday, July 27, 2013

Proof They Used 2 Planes Flight 214 Hoax

Credit to Max Malone and his team. This video summarizes that work and provides additional compelling proof of the staging of this fake event with two planes.


Proof They Used 2 Planes Flight 214 Hoax


Published on Jul 13, 2013 by Max Malone
Freeze the eyewitness video at 2:45 and 3:05 just before they show the other plane at 3:06, six windows, then seven windows above the A in airlines.

8 comments:

  1. ffs! Why does every fucking event have to be a fucking conspiracy? This is total bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The reason why "everything has to be a fucking conspiracy", which those who think everything is "total bullshit" is because when using deductive reasoning, as well as paying attention to what is happening in the world, and in this country, it is only then possible to see what is truly happening. By refusing to even acknowledge these things, the mass majority are making it easier for everything 'bad' that we all complain about, to happen. These events are planned for two reasons: one, to create an emotional response from the mass public that progresses an agenda and two, to cause those people who do not do the research for themselves to continue to discount those that do as "crazy conspiracy theorists". Yet, throughout history, those considered CTs have usually been found out to be correct after the fact.

      I say this as a concerned American who IS seeing what is going on behind some of these events... give yourself a chance to decipher the information without putting your emotion into it, without thinking that anyone is crazy or obsessed, even without an ulterior motive. Just look at the evidence that gets dug up and use your own common sense and reasoning to decide if things seem "normal" to you. IF you can do that, without judging based on what you blindly believe because of conditioning, you may start to understand.

      The thing is, those of us who research this stuff only want the TRUTH, when we know the public is not getting that. You would think people would be GLAD we do this, but because CTs have been cast as psychos who make up theories, we are not. In actuality, most CTs are some of the brightest people alive, and ones who cannot deal with the fraud and the lies that are holding most of this nation - and the rest of the world - as hostages right within their own minds.

      Please give it some thought.

      Delete
    2. It's an addiction like alcoholism, gambling and born-again christians.
      The make the public think that journalists who read wikileaks and the NSA files are painted in the same "conspiracy nut" catogory as this guy!
      Dis-information at its finest :-(

      Delete
  2. ok ok, did you consider that the indent in the first plane you showed had light present so that the dimensions could be seen? (you cant see shit without shadows) the area where the indent is on the plan at the crash had no light pointed towards it at all and the video quality was a little shiety. i even see different random shades of color on just the supposed to be plain white protective layer of the plane. HAH i even back tracked to the first plane on the video (the one with light) and my video quality dropped to the same as the second plane video and i could almost hardly see it the indent.
    ... cmon dood..

    ReplyDelete
  3. i'm really sorry but i count seven windows in both planes, so i have no idea what you're talking about on this one???

    ReplyDelete
  4. As the fire developed you can see the penetrating burn patterns under the Asian Airline sign – so too has the fire burnt through the unused window patch leaving a blackened window shape….. Go get qualifications in fire scene examination then actually examine a couple of hundred fires and some plane crashes before letting your furtive imagination loose. Also examine the damage pattern on the visible wing area in the region of the engine mount. Grass..? Take in mind the number of feet that trampled the area post evacuation. Your evaluation is not even amateur.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I live in the area and im pretty sure there was not two planes... ill believe the local witnesses over some faceless monotone voice... Get a life instead of trying to convince people that several thousand people are in on one massive lie. Boston Marathon maybe... but this? really?

    ReplyDelete
  6. OK, two planes, got it, AND of different days, perhaps in completely different areas. So, question is, how did we get both photos, and where did they come from, in terms of location. I live a few miles away from the SF airport and saw the black smoke. Like about 11:30 am, BEFORE I knew anything about a crash. I think it took about two hours before I got the info about a 'crash,' from the media talking heads, then that's all they talked about, and rather good, too.

    So, you DID uncover a problem here, but now the question is WHO BENEFITS???? That's what has to be done to get to the bottom of this.

    ReplyDelete